
When investors think of artificial intelligence (AI), names like Nvidia (NVDA), Palantir (PLTR), and Alphabet (GOOGL) typically come to mind. But AI’s impact extends well beyond the traditional tech sector. A standout example is Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), the clear global leader in robotic surgery, now making significant strides in integrating AI into healthcare. The company’s latest system, the da Vinci 5, incorporates AI capabilities that could unlock a powerful new and recurring revenue stream.
Despite its leadership position, Intuitive Surgical’s stock remains more than 15% below its all-time high, primarily due to competitive concerns, which may offer a compelling entry point for long-term investors. Given Intuitive Surgical’s strong technological moat, I believe concerns about competition are overstated. The company’s sustained innovation and market leadership position it well to remain a long-term winner.
Thanks to the widespread adoption of its flagship da Vinci system, Intuitive Surgical commands an estimated 60% share of the global robotic surgery market in 2024. Once a system is installed, the company benefits from a steady stream of recurring revenue through the sale of consumables such as surgical instruments. Additionally, hospitals often choose to upgrade their systems over time to stay aligned with the latest technology, further reinforcing this revenue model.
In 2024, Intuitive Surgical generated $8.4 billion in revenue, marking a 17% year-over-year increase—a testament to its ability to effectively monetize its platform. But beyond the strong financials, the company’s intangible advantages significantly deepen its competitive moat. Over the past three decades, the da Vinci system has amassed an extensive base of real-world clinical data, contributing to better patient outcomes—something that is difficult, if not impossible, for competitors to replicate quickly.
Moreover, Intuitive Surgical is deeply embedded in healthcare systems worldwide. Hospitals invest heavily in training surgical teams, adapting clinical protocols, and integrating the technology into their workflows. This creates substantial switching costs and a high degree of operational lock-in. Even if a competitor were to offer a lower-cost alternative, the economic and logistical barriers to switching remain a significant deterrent.